The video is only six minutes long so watch the entire thing. At first it’s fun to laugh at the idiots waiting in line for literally weeks. But then you get to the 4:35 mark. If you have any individuality at all you feel a bit ashamed that this is happening. How are has our American culture become so empty where segments of us will debase themselves in such a way just for a trinket.
Crowds of people cheering a person for buying a phone. Meanwhile, our private property rights are slowly being eroded, the police are increasingly becoming militarized, the government is trying to define a journalist so they can erode the 1st Amendment, the government is making a hard press to erode the 2nd Amendment’s protection of the right to bear arms, and the government is sweeping up and retaining private information on individuals who are not suspected of any crime. This list can go on and on.
Things like the iPhone, amongst other distractions (think professional sports), are the modern day gladiator arenas. Give the citizens their distractions so they don’t pay attention to what the political and big corporate classes are doing. We are the frogs in the pot and the water is getting pretty hot.
This is simply brilliant. Kevin Spacey can see what the major networks and the cable and satellite industry can’t. Content creators want to create content and content consumers want to consume it. Give the viewer/listener what they want and give it to them at a fair price and they will gladly pay for it.
The only thing standing that may stand between content creators and content consumers is government regulation. How long will it be before the federal government moves in to license users of the Internet. The more they call it a public utility the closer they are moving towards all out regulation.
Forward to 2:24 and then 3:08 for a couple of great incites.
Every year there is an experience that many parents share. It’s something they know is coming from the moment their kids are born but somehow gets pushed to the back of their minds until the day it actually arrives. That experience is the act of letting go.
Eighteen years is not enough. A crib is bought. Christmas trees get picked out. There is the park and lullabies and a little help with homework. The days pass uncounted, until they end. The adjustment is traumatic.
There are moments that are burned into your brain. The moment I turned to leave my daughter at college and the moment I watched my wife hug my son just before we left him at his dorm are two memories where the scar tissue is still quite warm.
The unemployment rate is at 7.4%. It is the lowest rate since 2008. The number is absolutely meaningless, however. When the unemployment rate shrinks because the employment pie is smaller then there is little use to even publishing the number in the first place.
Nationally, the jobless rate fell to 7.4 percent in July, the lowest level since December 2008, largely due to people giving up on the job hunt and dropping out of the work force.
For example, if there are 100 people in the employment pie and 9 of them are not working then the unemployment rate is 9% (9 out of 100 or 9/100 = 9%). If 5 of those 9 people leave the employment pie (people dropping out of the workforce) then without a single person finding a job the unemployment rate drops to 4.2% (4 out of 95 or 4/95 = 4.2%).
Magically it looks like more people are working when not a single person gained or lost a job. What I would like to know is why don’t reporters press the government on these bullshit numbers?
For the real picture of employment in the United States look to shadowstats.com. Somewhere before 1995 the rate was calculated much differently. Then in 2009 something changed again and not for the better. According to shadowstats, even though the “official” rate is at 7.4% and dropping, the real unemployment rate is closer to 23% and climbing.
The wool has been pulled over our eyes and no one seems to want to pull the covers off. Things are not good. In fact, they are bad and getting worse.
Just as I called for the Feds to go after Apple (because we all know how influential I am) for anti-competitive behavior with their scheme to raise prices on e-books I believe the Feds should now set their sites on Google. Google is blocking Microsoft from building a YouTube app for its Windows Phone OS. This is anti-competitive behavior that seeks to do nothing but keep Microsoft from gaining market share and the Feds should put a stop to it.
I’ll preface the rest of this post by saying that I’m not a Windows Phone user and that I’ve been an Android user for the last 4 years or so. I moved from Windows Mobile 6 to Andriod on the HTC Incredible. I use most of Google’s services because they are part of the open web and they work cross platform in multiple OSes and browsers. Skip to the next to last paragraph to get right to my rant on Google. The next two paragraphs give some background on my thinking.
Back in the 90’s when the Feds went after Microsoft for anti-competitive behavior for bundling Internet Explorer (IE) with Windows I was dead set against it because even though Microsoft bundled their browser the user was in no way locked in to using that browser. Even though the browser was free I believe users would have paid for a competing browser if it was better. In those early days of the Web browsing was not a great experience with just about any browser and IE’s main competitor was Netscape Navigator. You could get it for free if you knew how but most people had to pay for it. The browser was the precursor to all the free ad supported software and services you see today. What Microsoft did was not anti-competitive in so much as it was forward thinking. Bill Gates knew the future of the company was tied to the Internet and the Web and pivoted the company to move aggressively in that direction. Consumers were not harmed by their actions but helped and as hindsight I think this was proven as correct. By the time the Feds were done with Microsoft the computing landscape changed so much that their case was moot. But, the damage had been done.
I called for the Feds to go after Apple with regard to e-books because I believed it was unlawful for a company to conspire with other companies with the purpose of driving up prices to curtail the expansion of market share of a competitor. I’m glad that the Federal government saw it the same way and went after the publishers and Apple. Amazon was aggressively pricing Kindle books partly to gain and secure market share and partly to appropriately price a product that was purely digital and had none of the legacy costs of the physical product. This was good for publishers and good for consumers. Publishers didn’t see it this way, much like record labels didn’t see the value in MP3s, and sought out a partner to stem the tide of Amazon’s expansion. Apple was much to eager to comply and positioned themselves to be the arbiter of all e-book prices. This was the only way they could see themselves curtailing Amazon’s growing market share and securing their position as Amazon’s main competitor in the new and growing e-book market. Their mistake was that their plans were harmful to consumers. E-book prices, upon consummation of the publishers deal with Apple, immediately went from an average price of $9.99 to around $12.99 to $13.99. Suddenly on Amazon’s site it was cheaper or around the same price to buy a physical book as it was to buy an e-book. It had to have a chilling effect on the e-book growth. I know I shifted back to buying new release hardbacks instead of Kindle books. I could not have been alone and the Feds seemed to agree.
Google is exhibiting some of the same anti-competitive behavior that Microsoft was accused and that Apple committed. Google will not make a native YouTube app, amongst other native apps, for Windows Phone and Windows 8. Microsoft has responded by creating their own native app that allow their users to to view YouTube on Windows Phone. Google is blocking this effort. In the beginning Google was in the right. Microsoft was clearly violating Google’s terms of service by blocking advertising and allowing downloads of YouTube videos. These actions by Microsoft was all a ploy to tweak Google and Google has taken the bait. In the latest chapter in this drama Microsoft has complied with all of Google’s demands and Google still blocks the app. Why? By making an unreasonable demand that Microsoft code their YouTube app using HTML5. A demand that is not made on Apple or Android. This is anti-competitive and in my opinion illegal. If Google is the proponent of the open Web as they are then they should embrace Microsoft building their own app to access their services. After all, doesn’t Google benefit from Windows Phone users using Google’s services? Instead what Google is seeking to do is protect their domination of the phone and mobile OS universe. They do not want Windows Phone gaining a foothold because it will surely erode some of Android’s dominance. iOS will not be harmed because it is less likely for Apple users to switch to a Microsoft system because they are locked in to the Apple ecosystem. Android users are generally not locked in to Google’s ecosystem because it’s more open. Show me anyone that’s locked into the Google Play Store. Consumers are harmed because they are restricted of choice. YouTube is an open system with APIs that others are free to utilize. For market share protection Google is denying Microsoft access to this open system and thereby harming all Windows Phone users by making them choose between iOS and Android alone if they want to access YouTube easily. This is wrong and illegal.
I think it should be rare for the Feds to jump in to the market unless a monopoly or market leader is using their position to harm consumers. The Feds consistently step in where they don’t belong as in with the bank and auto bailouts. When a company’s behavior is clearly anti-competitive and harmful to consumers that’s the only time the Feds should interfere with market forces.
I was reading this review of the 11″ MacBook Air on AnandTech today and came to the realization that Apple could now easily create an OS X/iOS hybrid system, call it the MacPad, and dominate the tablet/PC market for the foreseeable future.
The new Intel Haswell based chips give the 11″ MacBook Air 8 – 10 hours of battery life. This surpasses the latest iPad by at least an hour. Add to this the fact that the two devices are nearly identical in size and you have a recipe for the best tablet/pc hybrid on the market.
Apple has the design expertise to remove the keyboard and lower the weight to where it can possibly match the iPad. Or, make a dockable keyboard that doesn’t look clunky like it does on so many Windows 8 hybrid PCs. I think a MacPad with no keyboard would be the genius move. I’ve seen so many people carry around that tiny little Apple bluetooth keyboard with their iPads in airports and hotels that it can’t be much of a stretch for them to do this with a MacPad.
If I were to do a MacPad I would have iOS run as an application or have an iOS emulator that can run all the iOS apps that people use today. Then users can keep their iOS apps running in a window while also using OS X for actual computing.
I don’t use Macs or iPads (Although I have used them) because I don’t like to be trapped in the Apple ecosystem. I am also not fond of the UI on Macs or iPads. I did buy a Surface Pro in the hopes that Microsoft would get this right and I can tell you that I’m not at all happy with their implementation of the tablet/PC hybrid concept. Seems there are a lot of people that didn’t like Microsoft’s concept either given the company had a $900 million dollar right off due to the Surface’s, in both the RT and Pro forms, lack of popularity.
It would be just like Apple to push out a tablet/PC hybrid after Microsoft and their followers and have it take off like a rocket. This would have the potential to put the nails in the coffin of any Windows 8 RT or Windows 8 Pro system. For the love of God Microsoft please get it together.
A story in the Guardian today highlights a company I never heard of until today, Lavabit. Lavabit provided an e-mail service that allowed their users to encrypt their messages thereby keeping them private between sender and recipient. What is Lavabit’s crime? We don’t exactly know. However, reportedly this is the service that Edward Snowden used to communicate with reporters.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
So how is it that we have a law in place that is preventing Lavabit from publicly discussing their case? Something is radically wrong with our nation if we continue to allow these infringements upon our liberties.
The last paragraph in the statement from the owner of Lavabit gives some good advice:
This experience has taught me one very important lesson: without congressional action or a strong judicial precedent, I would _strongly_ recommend against anyone trusting their private data to a company with physical ties to the United States.
I really love this town. I just wish I spent more time in it. Sometimes I get mired with the news of all the corruption in the city and the state and I start to dislike where I’m from. Then, someone makes a simple 2 minute video like this and I love it all over again. This was posted a year ago and I’m just finding it now. There is no place like Chicago.
I was making sandwiches, another worker took the order and a third made the milkshakes and watched the grills. A line grew while we worked, and we had to tell other customers that their lunch orders would take longer than usual. They paid; I asked my co-worker who was dealing with the money how much of a tip they’d left. They had left actually no tip at all. (They had paid with a card so we checked the cash tips to see if there’d been a bump. There hadn’t.)
I asked some of the group as they were picking up their orders if they had intended to not tip. They hemmed and hawed and walked away.
Well. I could have not said anything. I could have made it a subtweet. I probably should have made it a subtweet. But I didn’t
, because of some misguided notions about having “the courage of your convictions,”
Shout out to the good people of Glass, Lewis & Co. for placing a $170 order and not leaving a tip. @glasslewis
Two days later, I got a text from the owner asking if I was free to talk on the phone at some point. We spoke later that afternoon.
He told me that he’d gotten a call from the company, Glass, Lewis & Co. The company provides shareholder advisory services. Apparently, those employees were mortified that their lunch truck had tip-shamed them—the home office in San Francisco even got involved.
And it was unfortunate but he was going to have to let me go. The company has a way of doing things and he thought I’d understood that. I had embarrassed him and the company and that was that.
Then he tells us what he learned from this experience:
What did I get out of this? Hmm. A “story,” maybe. A lesson about employers—at least in the food service industry—and what they think of workers advocating for themselves.
To be fair, maybe I’m not the best employee for a gamified grilled cheese truck. About a month earlier, I’d come into work on a Saturday and was told I’d need to work late the next day. (Our schedules are established on a weekly basis, so this was very late notice.) I believed this gave me some degree of leverage. So I started bargaining. If they needed me to stay late on Sunday with only 24 hours notice, surely it was only fair that they let me go early that night?
They weren’t too happy about this and my bargaining failed—they just found someone else to work late on Sunday. I suppose this is why ‘collective bargaining’ is a thing.
Perhaps if he tried to start his own food truck business he might realize the risk his employer took to start his venture. Then he might learn that publicly insulting customers that are paying $170.00 for an order of grilled cheese sandwiches is stupid and jeopardizes everything the owner worked for and risked in starting his food truck.
Then to bring up “collective bargaining” like it’s relevant to his situation because he wasn’t happy about the hours he was being given shows an utter lack of understanding of any kind of employer/employee relationship and what abusive working conditions really are.
This guy’s tale is indicative of where the American culture has gone. You know we’re done leading the world with stories such as these.