Did anyone actually hear what President Trump said? Or, are they only getting their information from media reports?

Did anyone actually hear what President Trump said? Or, are they only getting their information from media reports? I ask these questions because after all the sensationalist headlines I expected to see President Trump wearing a Nazi emblazoned jacket with his hand extended at a 60 degree angle pointed towards the sky. So, I went back and looked at President Trump’s speeches on Charlottesville and I’m having difficulty seeing the same thing that’s being reported.

Here are the speeches, in order from his first statement to his statement yesterday.

August 12, 2017

August 14, 2017

August 15, 2017

His remarks weren’t that long so anyone can invest a small amount of time to get it from the source. At the risk of sounding like a Trump supporter, I honestly don’t see anything wrong with anything President Trump said. I just don’t see it.

If you want to take the perspective that his first speech wasn’t strong enough that’s fine. But after the second speech it should have put the issue to bed. The third speech Trump was just plainly pissed off at what he perceived as a mischaracterization of what he said.

I think what’s happening here is that since the invention of TV a President hasn’t talked back to the press with such force as does President Trump. The media is used to shouting the questions and making the public figure cower. Trump doesn’t cower he talks back.

It’s hard to watch or read the news because virtually all news media hates Trump. He could help an old lady across the road and they would scream that he’s ageist and should have let her go across on her own.

We live in interesting times.

 

Cook County Pop Tax is 1,422% Higher than the Beer Tax.

Let them have beer! I just learned today that the Cook County Pop Tax (Soda Tax outside the Midwest) is 1,422% higher than the tax that’s charged for beer. I guess drinking pop is the bigger sin.

Cook County Illinois charges $0.09/gallon tax on beer while charging $0.01/ounce for pop. One gallon is 128 ounces. So we’re paying an extra $1.28 per gallon of pop while only paying an extra $0.09 per gallon for beer. I wish I liked beer.

In fact, liquor taxes are also much less providing it’s under 20 percent alcohol. Under 14 percent alcohol the Pop Tax is 533.33% higher and if the alcohol is between 14 percent and 20 percent the Pop Tax is 284.44% higher. Only when we get to more than 20 percent alcohol is the alcohol tax higher by 195% over the Pop Tax

Section 74-352(a)(4) shows the relevant beer tax.

Two opinions – One Sea Level Rise Study

In the constant back and forth over “climate change” (I still so hate that term as it is so nebulous as to be totally meaningless) and the rate of rising seas nature.com posted an article with the headline, “Satellite snafu masked true sea-level rise for decades“.  The headline alone leads you to believe that water has been rising up on the shorelines in an accelerated pace for decades. But a prominent climate scientist who is not one of the so-called “97% of climate scientists” that are alarmist over “climate change” had a different take once he bothered to read a little deeper.

Here’s an excerpt from the article on nature.com.

The numbers didn’t add up. Even as Earth grew warmer and glaciers and ice sheets thawed, decades of satellite data seemed to show that the rate of sea-level rise was holding steady — or even declining.

Now, after puzzling over this discrepancy for years, scientists have identified its source: a problem with the calibration of a sensor on the first of several satellites launched to measure the height of the sea surface using radar. Adjusting the data to remove that error suggests that sea levels are indeed rising at faster rates each year.

Dr. Roy Spencer, a climate research scientist at the University of Alabama, saw the headline and at first drew the same conclusion. But then he thought to read the rest of the story and look at the supporting documents.

When I read that, I (like everyone else) assumed that corrections to the satellite sea level data since 1993 have now led to a revised trend toward faster (not slower) sea level rise. Right?

Wrong.

During the satellite era (since 1993), the trend in sea level rise was revised downward, by almost 10%, from 3.28 mm/year to about 3.0 mm/year. (For those concerned about Miami going underwater, these numbers equate to a little more than one inch every 10 years). This result was published back in April in Geophysical Research Letters, and the new Nature study looks at the wiggles in the revised data since 1993 and makes ominous pronouncements about sea level rise “acceleration”.

I’m calling “fake science news” on the Nature reporter who covered the story. The headline was technically correct…but misleading.

Here’s the conclusion from the paper on which both opinions are based.

The new approach based on the GMSL budget indicates a drift of 1.5 ± 0.5 mm/yr, in agreement with the preferred value of Watson et al. [2015] but lower than Zawadzki et al. [2016]. Applying this correction over the first 6 years of the altimetry record leads to lower GMSL rate (of 3.0 ± 0.15 mm/yr) over the altimetry era than previously assumed. More importantly, the GMSLrise since the mid-2000s shows significant increase compared to the 1993–2004 time span. This contradicts conclusion of previous studies [e.g., Cazenave et al., 2014] that reported slowing down of about 30% of the GMSL rise during the years 2000s (without TOPEX A drift correction), attributed to La Niña events. Here we show that in spite of the several temporary sea level drops caused by La Niña events, the GMSL rise has increased during the last decade.

It’s funny how all this controversy is about 3mm over 6 years. We need an analog to Chicken Little for rising seas because the sky was not falling and our continents are not drowning.

Here’s the article on nature.com

Here’s Dr. Roy Spencer’s opinion on his blog

Here’s a link to the study

The Republican Party is all show and no go.

The Republican party is all show and no go. What a disappointing first 6 months with President Trump in office. These knuckle heads kept passing Obamacare repeal bills while President Obama was still in office. They did so knowing he would veto every single one if they made it to his desk. Now, they have a President that doesn’t really care what bill they pass. All he wants them to do is pass one so he can declare victory and these numb-nuts  can’t get out of their own way to get something passed.

This shows me that they are more worried about the next election cycle than they are about the country. It shows me that all their bluster about President Obama’s policies were just that… bluster. If they can’t pass legislation now that they have wanted to pass for the last 6 years then it tells me they never really wanted to pass this crap in the first place.

The Affordable Care Act was anti-American from the start. With its insurance purchase mandate (which was disappointingly upheld by the Supreme Court because they created language that didn’t exist in the law by calling the mandate a “tax”), mandatory coverage of pre-existing conditions, and the truly anti-competitive insurance exchanges this abomination should have never passed through Congress. But it did. And it did with ONLY Democrat votes. Not a single Republican voted for it.

Now, the Republicans having a majority in both the House and Senate, with a President that will SIGN ANYTHING, and they are incapable of, at the very least, fully repealing this anti-American law.

How pathetic!

CMOS and the effect of the rolling shutter. https://youtu.be/dNVtMmLlnoE

CMOS and the effect of the rolling shutter. If you’ve ever wondered why your cell phone camera produces strange effects when taking video this will explain it all. Very cool stuff.

File this under, “They Can Dish It Out But They Can’t Take It”

File this under, “They Can Dish It Out But They Can’t Take It”.   President Trump tweets this:


And the media reacts like this:

Is it any wonder why he does it? How can the news media be so thin skinned? President Trump isn’t advocating violence against the media he’s dressing them down in a humorous way. No thinking person, in my opinion, can take the tweeting of that ridiculous video as a threat against anyone.

When Democrats claim that the Republican plan to “repeal and replace” the ACA (aka Obamacare) will kill thousands of people can that be construed as a threat against Republicans? How do you think supporters of the ACA would react if they truly believe that Republicans want them and their loved ones to die just so Republicans can give “tax cuts to the rich”.

Maybe members of the media should get a clue and stop covering President Trump’s every tweet. Most of his tweets are nonsense and don’t matter to a hill of beans to bettering the country. Most of it is not news worthy. But, because he’s taking jabs at the news media they are so self centered and thin skinned that they can’t take it.

Once again I’m back in style! All I have to do is wait long enough.

Once again I’m back in style! All I have to do is wait long enough. When you don’t change for decades the styles all eventually come back around to you. Normal jeans are back baby!

The stretch backlash gained momentum in 2015 when streetwear label Vetements, designed by Demna Gvasalia, repurposed vintage Levi’s, said Barneys fashion director Marina Larroudé. “Fashion insiders were getting old 501s tailored for a long time, but Gvasalia brought [reworked Levi’s] to a wider audience,” she said. Despite a four-figure price tag, Vetements’ pure cotton jeans—pieced together from various vintage pairs—were a hit.

But $850.00 for a pair of jeans from Dior? Give me a break! As a matter of fact, give me a $50.00 pair of Levi’s 501 jeans and I’ll make it work for 10 years.

From the Wall Street Journal