Kevin Bae: Hello, everybody my name is Kevin Bae. This is the
that's all I got podcast which changed the name of this podcast
to spitting in the wind or spit into the wind. One or the other.
I saved the domain I can't remember which one it is
spitting into the wind spit into the wind. The reason being is
that that's what it feels like I do all the time on the blog, or
on this podcast. It's basically spitting in the wind because
Yammer on and it really has no effect on anything at all. Other
than maybe, maybe it helped maybe it's a nice outlet for me
and my mood. Which I'm in a poor mood today. Very poor mood. Now
this I'm not broadcasting this one live on YouTube. And I'll
probably just put like up a little promo video and put the
actual full video just up on my website. Because I'm going to
talk about COVID-19 I'm going to talk about ivermectin and last
time I did that on YouTube, it took me down. So, you know,
screw it. Just this whole this whole thing has just gotten so
ridiculous. So what let's say it says August 9 2021. I was
supposed to record on Friday and of course I didn't do it. What
episode of my on on this podcast? I'm all over the road.
My mood is so shitty. So so shitty. Let me go to let me
check out what episode I'm supposed to be on. 15 Episode 15
Ah, okay, let's let's get this sucker in the can. Let's Tim
Poole it and see this get off my back end of my WordPress site.
So it's like it's it's all COVID all the time every day until
we're all just beaten into submission with this shit. I was
amused that in the UK, children are using antigen tests, which
is a rapid test, I guess that they have at home. I don't know
if you can even buy them here. But kids in the UK they're
getting out of school by faking positive COVID tests and how are
they doing it? They're doing it by using little Coca Cola and
fruit juices from the BBC. Children are always going to
find cutting ways to bunk off school. I guess that's what they
call getting out of school in the UK. And the latest trick is
to fake a positive covid 19 lateral flow test using soft
drinks. So how are fruit juices, cola and devious kids fooling
the tests? And is there a way to tell a fake positive result from
a real one? somebody tried to find out the reporter first I
thought it best to check the claim. So I cracked open bottles
of cola and orange juice then deposited a few drops directly
on to the lateral flow test strips. Sure enough, a few
minutes later, two lines appeared on each test supposedly
indicating the presence of the virus that causes covid 19.
Brilliant. Nothing like a test that can prove positive with a
little bit of Coca Cola and fruit juice and or fruit juice.
So who's to say when you're going someplace and they want
you to test positive that they're not just throwing some
shit on if you're taking one of these rapid tests, throwing some
shit on it and say hey, you're now you're now infected your
festering pool of COVID-19 of SARS Coby to the state of
Illinois and flat, flat fat boy which I wish he was flat. Well,
I don't live in Illinois anymore. I moved out because of
guys like this fat motherfucker. This dumb fat fuck. Tribune
asked the question the Chicago Tribune that it is, is it
ethical to offer lottery entries in exchange for people to get
vaccinated? To me? It's an obvious answer. No, especially
when the state of Illinois is drowning in hundreds of billions
of dollars in pension debt.
So fat ass blue boy image which is not really routable
Gourevitch fat boy, which is governor JB Pritzker. I call
them fat boy Vich because to me, he looks a lot like Rod
Blagojevich just blown up to gargantuan proportions. And I
know it's not popular to fat shame people these days. But I
just dislike him on all kinds of levels. This is a man who lived
in it's the Gold Coast of Chicago. But which is like, it's
in the city just north of downtown. And it's where a lot
of wealthy people have properties. He bought the
property next door, removed all the toilets from the property in
order to eliminate over $300,000 that he would have to pay in
property taxes. He eventually repaid it once it was
discovered. But the fact that he did it, well, your average
person doesn't have these capabilities. And, you know,
while maybe it was technically legal what he did, I mean, come
on. He's a billionaire. He was getting rid of $300,000 in
taxes, which is more property taxes than I would have paid in
my house. Or over 30 years. $300,000 is just, in my opinion,
it's just a giant asshole. Anyway. Chicago Tribune reports.
Is it ethical to offer lottery entries in exchange for people
to get vaccinated? What about prize money? How about taking
things away if they don't like your freedom? motherfuckers?
Yes, I'm in a mood sorry. As the Delta Varian complicates the
recovery from the pandemic and health officials seek ways to
convince people to get vaccinated, many incentives are
emerging in Illinois, the Department of Public Health has
offered $7 million in cash prizes, and $3 million in
scholarships. In recent weeks, prizes went to residents at
Chicago, Quincy, Springfield, Berwyn, and Joliet. Last week,
the Chicago Health Department announced they will offer $25
Visa gift cards for those vaccinated at home. What a bunch
of mother fucking assholes. You know, and it just makes you feel
if you're at all opposed to any of this stuff. Regarding
COVID-19 and forced vaccinations, it should be
highly disgusting that they're running a lottery for this shit.
The vaccine is so effective, and so desirable. And COVID-19 is so
dangerous that they need to run fucking lotteries where they
will pay you to get this fucking thing. You know, what about what
about all the businesses that they shut down? I think they
could use the $7 million or the 10 million to get 7 million in
cash and 3 million in scholarships. You know, what if
your restaurant went out of business because of these
motherfuckers and they're giving away $7 million of taxpayer
dollars, whether they came from the feds or whether they came
from the people of Illinois. They don't make any money on
their own. They take it from you and then they spread it out. So
I mean, what if what if you had a little little grocery store a
little corner store that they put out of business because of
their fucking lockdowns and their goddamn mandates, and now
they're giving away millions of dollars. It just pissed me off.
PCR tests change the definition of infected. There was a video
on YouTube by Alison Morrow. She's a former journalist. And
now she's like our I guess that former journalist, she's an
independent journalist. Now she used to be on TV, regular TV.
And she interviewed somebody who has experienced with the PCR
tests and reports how the PCR tests are not real tests for the
virus, they just basically tell you whether it's there or not.
But it doesn't tell you whether or not you can get infected. Let
me see if I can pull up the version,
Unknown: I did not scare you away, you are back for your
second go at you remember maybe hearing that? Well, then they
would take a sample and they would send it to a laboratory
that would grow it in their lab for a few days and say, Yep,
this is definitely strep or Nope, this is definitely not
strep, your rapid tests was wrong. So really, they're like
three things there that would need to happen before they would
say you have strep. The doctor would check your symptoms, he do
a rapid test, and then he'd send a test out for culture. So
sending a test out for culture confirms that not only is the
microorganism presence that causes that illness, but that
it's actually active, it's growing. So a PCR test can tell
you whether a virus is present or absent. Because like I said,
the gene I'm looking for is either present or it's absent.
But it can't tell you what condition that particular gene
or micro organism is in. So you can have a bit of genomic
material that's there. And maybe it'll register in the PCR test.
But it's not actually replicating. So we've even
changed the definition of sick, infected. Nice. And I know the
guy from the FDA says this is the gold standard. Well, the
gold standard in terms of what? It's the gold standard, maybe in
terms of sure it's a it's a fancy test. It's very accurate
tests in terms of Yes, the virus is present. No, it's not
present. But it doesn't actually tell you whether the virus is
actually active. So really, a cell based assay, in my opinion,
would be the gold standard, because then it tells you, yes,
it's present. And yes, it's active. So it tells you two
things, it PCR just tells you it's present, or it's not
present. And like I said, it can't tell the difference
between different viruses. But can it tell me if it's alive or
not? I know there's a comp, there's a disk.
Kevin Bae: This is more more stuff. That you have to go to
places like YouTube for. You're not going to hear it on the
morning news. It's not going to be on Good Morning, America.
It's not going to be on the NBC Nightly News. It's not it's not
going to be anywhere it's going to be in the New York Times. The
Washington Post, probably won't even be in the Wall Street
Journal, although they've been better. Why do we have to go?
Why do we have to get this only from YouTube? And I'm surprised
that the video is still up, to be honest. Because it kind of
downplays the PCR test and tells, you know, tells you
exactly what it is what it can do and what it can't. You know,
while that's the that's the test that's being used to tell us
whether or not we're all being killed by the delta, delta delta
plus or and now the lambda, which is coming down the pipe.
And let's see, I had a post this week that said, strapping folks
vaccine mandate headed our way. And it's because the FDA, it's
you know, they were they're floating the balloons now have
the FDA giving full approval to the Pfizer vaccine, even though
I think Madonna's application went in first. But you can be
sure, since they're floating this, and you know, businesses
have been mandating vaccinations for their employees. Which I
don't know why this hasn't been taken up in the courts, for an
experimental vaccine that is supposed to be voluntary. How a
business can force an employee to get it? How is that business
not liable if there's a severe adverse reaction and somebody
dies? I don't understand it. But you can bet once the Pfizer or
Madonna or the j&j. Once any of those gets formal approval by
the FDA, then you're going to start seeing governmental
mandates to get yourself vaccinated with something that
you don't want. What else did I put here? Oh, okay. I had a
small this is about the future of podcasting, of which I'm
nobody obviously. And, you know, to me of media in general. You
know, I'm fiddling around with podcasts just because I'm
interested in the technology and not the old technology, but the
new technology that of extending RSS the, if you go to podcast
index.org. And you go look at what they're doing, they are
extending RSS, and RSS is the feed. You know, when you when
you go into a podcast app, regardless of it other than
Spotify, but if you're into if you're in Apple podcasts, or
Google, Google podcasts, or any of the more popular podcast apps
that are independent. Generally, when you're pulling a podcast
down to that app, it looks at what's called an RSS feed. And
it stands for real Simple Syndication. I know there's
another definition out there, but I believe that's the most
popular one real Simple Syndication. And it's really
just a text file that contains information about the podcast
and the episodes and allows you to download them to the app. And
the group behind podcasting 2.0 they're extending RSS to do more
than just that. They've already extended it to where you can get
tracks. transcripts live transcripts as you're listening
to the podcast. And I do that with this podcast, you'll be
able to see those shortly after I post. There's also chapters
and chapters existed before, but they had to be embedded within
the mp3 file. This one allows you this is like chapters in the
cloud. So this allows you to create your chapters after the
fact, provide chapter images to go along with it, and provide
links. So it, you know, it makes the podcast actually more
interactive. So if I'm talking about a specific video, or say,
A, say a product, say you're even doing your own, you know,
your own advertising, and you talk about a specific product,
you can include an image of that product, and maybe a link to
where somebody can go to buy that product. They're also doing
what's called value for value or streaming payments, you
know, most, I would say most podcasters, or most pad people
in podcasting, right now, they look for ads, you know, other
other people that are hobbyists like myself, who are just doing
this because they feel like it, don't care if we get ads. Don't
care about any of that stuff. But I'm experimenting with the
value for value model, were you able to if you're using a one of
the podcasting 2.0 apps that allow you to stream Bitcoin, or
fractions of Bitcoin called satoshis, to the podcaster,
while you're listening, so it's like a pay pay as you listen
kind of technology. So they have something called the value block
and the podcaster. I don't even know how to explain how to
explain it properly, but we get a wallet. Mine is on the
lightning network. On ln PE, l n, PE, so the letter L, the
letter n and then the word PE. And so when somebody streams,
when somebody listens to this using a streaming payment app,
you know, every minute, or whatever certain number of
satoshis are streamed directly to my wallet, there's nobody in
between, there's no bank in between. You know, there's no
advertiser in between, necessarily. So it's just a
transaction between the listener and the podcaster. Now, there's
other little splits that happen in the middle, you know, like,
there might be a 1% split for the for Ellen pay, which I
piggyback off of, for my wallet, otherwise, I'd have to have a
full node, which I don't want to have to pay for. Because I'm not
really getting much out of there. I did get 2500 sets a
couple weeks ago. So looking forward to anybody else who
wants to send money this way, or satoshis this way. But also
that, you know, you can, you know, people do make direct
payments to podcasts using things like Patreon, or PayPal,
or you know, other services where there's a definite
percentage cut, Patreon takes a big cut from what I understand,
I've never used them. PayPal, you know, they take a small
percentage cut for processing the payment, but that's part of
the course, or par for the course for using any type of
electronic payment, whether using a credit card, Pay Pal,
whatever. So that you know, using Bitcoin and these
electronic wallets, it takes all the middleman out. So I can see
that as the future of, of paying for media. Pay As You Go pay as
you listen. And you can do something what's called a boost
where you boost extra payments for something that you either
found extra valuable, or extra entertaining, or for whatever
reason you feel like hey, I like that. So you give what's called
a boost. And you can set that boost to be whatever it is 500
satoshis 1000. Now, when I say 500 or 1000, we're not we're
still not talking about real money, we're talking about
fractions of $1. You know, I don't know, like one Satoshi is
a fraction of a penny and I think it's like 1,000,000,000th
of a Bitcoin or something like that. I forget what they said.
So it's not a lot of money we're talking about now, on a massive
scale, it could be substantial money, you know, small scale,
you know, it's not much of anything. So, for the individual
listener, you know, he might be streaming and a couple of bucks,
you know, maybe $10 at the most per episode that you're
listening to maybe five bucks, depending on how you have your
settings. So anyway, there's a long, long intro to the post
that I made earlier in the week where I said I'd rather be
lumped in with the crazies freaks nut cases and crack bots
in the live in a sanitized world. And the reason is I got
into a back and forth with somebody who's prominent in
power. Casting in the industry. And I'm, you know, me, I'm
nobody. So, you know, after a couple replies you know, I
decided okay, I don't really need to have less words let it
sit there. But there's a certain segment of the existing
podcasting industry and infrastructure that only sees
podcasting as an, as a vehicle for advertising. And the way I
see it advertising poisons the well. Because if you, you know,
say you run a tech podcast, and you have a tech company, like,
you know, say Samsung or Apple, or anybody, any big eight could
even be a small tech tech company that advertises on your
show. You know, how, how honest Can you be about the technology
you talk about if it has an effect on that company? You
can't you know, the how objective Could you be if your
money comes straight from the listener?
Now, I understand as well, that you're not going to get, you
know, the big mega dollars like you like, like you're going to
see with Joe Rogan, or any of the other giant podcasts or
like, let's say, podcasts that nobody really listens to, but
they they might say they do like the Obama, Michelle Obama
podcast. You know, people are willing to pay big money for the
names like Megan Markel, or whatever the hell, the other
Royal Prince guy who got kicked out of his own family, because
they felt that the family was racist. That's how much I pay
attention to the royal family, I forget who they are. So you have
companies willing to pay these people big bucks, because
supposedly they're a draw? I don't know if they are or not.
But I mean, you know, how worthless are those podcasts
going to be? They can't truly be honest about anything that they
talk about, it's really just a promotion for themselves, or
maybe the service that you're that you're listening out. So,
so I said that the push should be for podcasting. 2.0, it
should be more pushed towards independence. advertising is
fine. It has its place. You know, I used to be in
broadcasting for 20 plus years. Not on the on air side, but on
building TV and radio stations. You know, and it's regular TV,
regular radio, so they lived off of advertising and advertising
was not easy to get. But it has its place, especially for local
radio, local TV, it's how local businesses are able to get their
company seen, you know how you're going to know there's a
restaurant on the block if they don't advertise, you know,
unless you drive past it. So, Edwards advertising has its
place, but what these guys are talking about is not that type
of local advertising, they're talking about big corporate
advertising. And these people that want to buy, you know, I'm
into podcasting. And I see it as an insidiousness. You know,
just, it will water down if if podcasting 2.0 if that's the
main focus of increasing advertising, podcasting will go
down the way other media has gone down, you know, television,
radio, I'm not talking about the independent TV and radio
stations, they're still pretty much independent. You know,
they're still beholden to advertisers, you're not gonna be
able to bad mouth, an advertiser, or, or bad mouth,
you know, a product that they put out or something, something,
anything to do with that advertiser, you really have to
be able to talk bad about it. But you look at how the media
landscape has consolidated, how television stations are all
owned by just a few giant companies across the country.
Same thing with radio. You know, most of the radio you listen to
the reason radio has gotten so bad, is because it's owned by,
you know, largely by large corporations which kind of
homogenize and sanitize the content. You know, when you hear
a really good local radio station, which there aren't that
many anymore. they cater to their, you know, the people that
listen to them, they're not catering to the advertiser
necessarily. They're catering to the audience and the audience is
what brings in the advertiser because the advertiser wants the
people that listen In large corporate broadcasting, it's the
other way around. They want the big advertisers and they don't
really give a shit about who's watching. Or whether or not it's
entertaining. They don't care. That's why television network
television is awful. It's it's really not even watchable
anymore. I don't know how anybody watches the news. The
news is the, you know, it's not even news anymore.
Especially when we're talking about things like COVID. They're
not giving you news. They're giving you whatever the line is
from the government. And they can't talk bad about
pharmaceuticals because farmers if you just watch the news, all
the advertising is from far, far, far too far
pharmaceuticals. That's what I'm going to name this podcast
pharmaceuticals. But they can't badmouth them because those are
the companies that advertise You know, when you watch the news,
that's it. They're they're all pharma ads. So are you think
you're really gonna see some honesty surrounding the COVID
vaccines or any other drug that they push? So, you know, a
couple of shows that I listened to the no agenda show in the low
carb MD podcast. These are both shows that are outside
mainstream thought. So the person I had the back and forth
with they kept Alright, this person kept calling people that
are outside the mainstream crazies, fringe crackpot. You
know, labeling these things, because it's not advertiser
friendly. You know, using words like nutcases freaks even. And
you know, I was pretty offended by it. And the person I'm
talking about, they know the pod father referred to as the pod
father, Adam curry, who is also heading up podcast index, that
orc. And Adam curry puts on the No, no agenda show with john C.
Dvorak, a former tech writer for PC Magazine, among other
magazines, and I've been reading john C. Dvorak, since I was a
teenager. And they cover topics in politics, government media,
and you know, they've got the best absolute best coverage of
COVID the vaccines of any other media, including the local
newspapers, you know, I read the Wall Street Journal, Chicago
Tribune and the Atlanta Journal. The no agenda show the first
hour, if you just listen to that first hour, you're gonna get
more news because they cover the world and they it's not like
they don't, you don't hear the network broadcast. They play
back the network broadcast and they point out the inconsistency
as they kind of analyze the media and how the media is
portraying what's going on. What it is honestly, some of the best
coverage you're gonna see and if you are pro vaccine pro COVID,
this pro lockdowns, pro masking, you're gonna listen to that
first hour, and you're gonna think these people are
crackpots. But what are they doing? They're giving their
opinion. And playing back useful news, the actual news that
everybody else in the world is watching, and they'll get stuff
from all over the world. Germany, France, the UK,
Australia, Africa, South America, they'll get news from
everywhere. It's not like they're just covering one angle.
And that's what makes it so valuable. But you can easily
call them freaks crazies nut cases, because they're not
following along with the media push. The next one's low carb MD
podcast, done by two doctors that advocate for basically low
carb diets now. They're, you know, they're these two doctors,
they also they had regular practices, working in the
hospital working in their regular medical offices. And
neither one of them liked the way things were going. So they
changed their practice and they started their own metabolic
health clinics. And the metabolic health clinics are
surrounded. Most of their patients, I guess, are
diabetics, type two diabetes, and obese patients. And so their
goal is to help them be metabolically healthy, to where
they can get off of drugs off of insulin off of other
pharmaceuticals, and live a healthy life, you know, lose
weight and all that kind of stuff. But they can also be
considered crackpots because the diet and the method that they
use to help their patients is not following the long the US
dietary guidelines.
It's different. They're using their own clinical experience to
help their patients feel better and get off of whatever drugs
they're on. Their goal is to actually stop having patients
but you can easily consider them crackpots. So when somebody
who's prominent in podcasting is talking like that, calling
people nut cases and they always bring out guys like Alex Jones.
What are you afraid of? If alex jones is such a nutcase? What
are you afraid of? You know, I when I I've never watched the
alex jones or listen to him. I've seen clips of him like
everybody else. And it's not something I would ever listen to
because he sounds like a nut bag. But so what that doesn't
mean you label them and you silence him kick them off. It
means if you don't like them, you don't listen to him. But
guys like this, who are prominent in podcasting and
trying to shape the direction of it bother me when they when they
want to silence people that they deem are freaks. I don't like
it. I don't like it. As my granddaughter would say.
Let's see. Okay, New York City. I'll skip him because I don't
really give a shit about the Blasio. And okay, here's where
we get into ivermectin. ivermectin, is a drug that has
been pushed off by the mainstream media. It's been
demonized. There was an article in a publication called Mountain
Home magazine. And in this long article, they cover different
people that have had to sue their hospitals in order to have
the drug administered. There's an 80 year old woman in upstate
New York. She came down with COVID before Christmas last
year. She was she had to be on a ventilator. She was in the ICU,
she was doing poorly. Her family had to sue in order to get
ivermectin administered, she was they were just waiting for her
to die. Basically. She was able to get it and she started
improving and she ended up going home that mirrors almost exactly
what happened to the woman in Illinois at Elmhurst Hospital,
where she also had to sue. In order to have ivermectin
administered what the federal government, the NIH, the CDC,
CNN, Fox News and MSNBC, CBS, NBC ABC, Dr. Fauci, Dr. Collins,
which is his boss, Facebook, Google, Twitter and any other
entity organization or person that is actively sought to
diminish the dissemination of information on the efficacy of
Iver meant of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19, in my
opinion, is now criminal. What is the reason for holding this
information back? What are they trying to do here? What you
know, what are they afraid of from this cheap ass drug? That
very prominent doctors that somebody who you know, this
isn't like, Joe Blow on the corner. If you go to FL CCC,
dotnet. And you go look up the doctors that are involved in
that organization. They're all very highly credentialed, you
know, famous in the medical field for their accomplishments.
And they talk about the effectiveness of this drug.
ivermectin. They can't get on network news. They can't get on
cable news. They're not covered by the major newspapers other
than there was an op ed in the Wall Street Journal not that
long ago. What's the endgame here? What is the purpose here?
When they may be you know, the guy And the media to me, could
be responsible for every person that dies. That's not allowed to
take this drug if they wanted to. Meanwhile, you're being
forced, literally forced to take a vaccination that no matter
what they say, it is experimental. The experiments is
happening now on the population of the world. Where ivermectin
is, has been proved is that it's not just a horse paste or
something to get rid of worms, like my dogs take ivermectin for
heartworm, that's the in their heartworm medication. But people
have been taking it humans have been taking it for other
illnesses that this anti parasitic takes care of. So it's
a human drug isn't an animal drug? is a given to animals more
often? Maybe? I don't know. But I know it's been given to
people. And it is a people a human drug? Where are the law
firms that need to sue over this? Where are they? Why isn't
anybody going after the government or the news
organizations or the social media companies for the
silencing of the efficacy of this drug, I don't understand
what's going on.
And that gets me to my last post that I did today, because I'm in
a mood. And part of it is going out in the world and seeing
people wearing their masks, because and they seem you know,
it's like the classic thing that we're going through right now.
They see me as the problem, I see them as the problem.
We gave in so easily. To all of this. We gave in so easily to
being told to put a piece of cloth over your face. We gave in
so easily, and rushed into injecting ourselves with an
experimental vaccine. And I guess everything that I've
talked about during this entire podcast now what 30 minutes
long? makes me sound like a batshit crazy conspiracy theory
person. But what am I left to do here? It seems to me, you know,
at the beginning, I gave the government and the so called
experts the benefit of the doubt thinking that they had genuinely
genuinely had people's best interest at heart. Maybe going
about things the wrong way, you know, doing things logically
like government usually does. But we're kind of past that
point now. We're past the point of just government bungling.
This is purposeful. And it feels purposeful. They're actively
demonizing and dehumanizing. People who do not want to get
vaccinated. Am I one of them? Yeah. I don't want to get
vaccinated. I don't feel I need it. I'm in a low risk group. You
know, who knows if I've even had COVID or not? We don't know. But
I'm in a low risk group. So I don't I don't get vaccinated for
things that I'm not at risk of.
But a vaccine is out there. And people who feel at risk, or
maybe are at high risk, and we know from over a year and a half
now this virus, who's at high risk, and in general, it still
is and it hasn't changed much. It still is people over the age
of 65. People who are obese people who have type two
diabetes and people who are have compromised immune systems.
They're largely at risk.
And we have a vaccine supposedly for these people. So there are
choices everybody can make. You can make your own risk
assessment and choose to get vaccinated. You could choose to
not get vaccinated and maybe try to treat yourself you know,
maybe you will take ivermectin or you know, use the ivermectin
protocols that are that were developed by the flcc See that?
But there are choices now. So if you feel at risk, you can
protect yourself. So what are you afraid of from people that
don't want to get vaccinated? If you're vaccinated, you're not at
risk anymore or you're low risk. What is it? What What right do
you have to force your protection on other people
you know, and dehumanizing people, because they don't want
to want to get a vaccine, they don't believe they need calling
them stupid, ignorant, super spreaders, you know, basically
calling them killers, you know,
and, you know, normal people, they've been frightened in the
submission. You know, first they were scared, you know, pandemic,
pandemic, all these people dying hospitals overwhelmed that they
didn't bother looking at who was actually in the hospital. And
who needed to be protected that, you know, the actual science
around it was ignored in favor of the quote unquote, the
science. And the science is political. It's not scientific.
So they convinced these people to put on a mask. They convinced
these people that, you know, if we just did that, a couple of
weeks, it'll slow the spread, and we'll be fine. But it didn't
work. You know. So people put on their mask. They thought okay,
things are gonna go back to normal. And then what happened?
lockdowns, mandatory lock downs. You can't go in a store. You
can't do this. You can't do that people are ordering food out. So
then people started to kind of relax. Okay, fine. You know,
we'll just ride this out over the next month or so. Then comes
the variance, deadly deadly variance.
And so people rush out and get vaccinated, will the vaccine
protect us from the variance? Push, push, push, push, push.
And then they're told Well, not enough people are being
vaccinated. The goal was 70% by July 4, you know, I don't know
what number they actually hit because the numbers kept
changing. Even if I read the news today, they're gonna say
70% are now vaccinated. Least with one jab, 50% to fully
vaccinated? I don't know. I don't know what the real number
is. They keep giving they keep giving different numbers for
different things. The same measurements are never used, so
you don't know what numbers are real. And then they start
turning the table saying, Okay, this is a pandemic of the
unvaccinated. What a lovely phrase. And that goal is
insidious that that phrase is insidious it the goal of it is
to pit neighbor against neighbor. Your unvaccinated
neighbor is an evil Fuck, because he wants you to die,
even though you're vaccinated and supposedly protected, but
he's a dumb ass rube. Who doesn't understand science or
I'm sorry, the science. People have been just whipped into this
frenzy.
You know, how, how different is this from the rise of the Nazis.
And I know everybody's complains about comparing this to the Jews
in World War Two. But I think there's enough there now to say
this is a we're having a similar beginning except this is not
about religion, or specific race of people. Which being Jewish is
not a race. It's a religion. We're talking about demonizing
the unvaccinated it's still a group of people who don't
believe that that's what they want. The unvaccinated are being
called evil, stupid. They're being dehumanized and selfish.
You don't want to protect others. You're not willing to
protect others. You want people to die. You know, and to me,
what has happened is that governments of the world world,
particularly the United Nations, the World Health Organization
and much of Europe, they're they're all globalists, the
United States historically has not been, we've been the ones
pushing and controlling things from our end, maybe maybe, for
our own purposes, we've joined in all these organizations.
But now we're fully on board. You know, climate change was the
big push to subdue the population and get everybody
going in a certain direction. To make you think that your modern
lifestyle is evil, and harming the planet.
But it didn't work. You know, and there's enough books out
there. Now, there's enough information out there. Now, if
you're looking for it, if you're not going to find it on the
news, because they keep reporting everything is linked
to climate change. Make no mistake, that's where COVID is
headed, it's headed towards climate change, all the policies
are the same. Just once COVID one climate change, there's
enough information out there to know that we don't have more
storms than before, we don't have more hurricanes before, we
don't have more wildfires than before, we don't have more
floods than before. None of those things are happening in
greater number. Their Earth, on average, maybe warmer than it
was before. Personally, I don't know. I mean, I know they've
taken satellite readings and stuff. But I'm still not, at
least in my mind, I'm not confident that these things are
totally accurate for the globe. But whatever. The globe is a
dynamic living system. Let's just take it to be true.
Historically, over human history, warming has resulted in
a benefit for human life. More humans have died during the ice
ages, than during any kind of warming period. Warming period
has always been a period where humans have thrived.
But let's throw that aside because that's actual science is
not the science. And the science is more interested in
controlling your behavior. Get an electric car, because it's
going to save the planet. Even though the in order to generate
the electricity and to save the electricity could be more
harmful than just keeping your internal combustion engine. Put
up windmills and solar panels that are dependent on the wind
and the sun that are not consistent. Forget about nuclear
power, it's too consistent, too consistent, too powerful and
provides too much power. We need to control the population.
But I think people in general, other than the news realized
they're not in big danger from climate change. And I don't
think the propaganda was working because human beings don't live
more than 100 years. You know, on average, I think what would
it be 70 to 80 years. Changes in the earth. Take 1000s, if not
10s of 1000s, if not hundreds of 1000s of years, the Earth is
over 4 billion years old. The changes that take place over
time are not something we can see as human beings. We haven't
been here that long. But the need of some people to exhibit
power over others has been here as long as we've been here. And
that is what they're after. And it's it's come to me now I don't
believe these people have anybody's best interest at
heart. All they have is their power grab. And they view you
and me and every other regular person as just a cog in the
machine. You are here to serve them. You're here to provide the
tax dollars you're here to provide whatever human capital
you are, to further their grip on power. What else can it be
there after the individualists they're after people who think
for themselves, that's why they're trying to demonize the
unvaccinated. Also with climate change is the same thing. The
End individualists sees right through this stuff. So what
better way to demonize the individualist than to say that
they want to kill your grandmother with a virus? They,
you know, by forcing you or I mean, look what's happened in
the United States, the eviction moratoriums, the foreclosure
moratoriums, that is a de facto nationalization of residential
real estate in the United States. When your private
property rights go, what what do you have left? If you're not
able to own yourself? If you're not able to own anything, what
do you have?
You know, do you own yourself if you're forced to get a
vaccination? If you don't have a say, and whether or not the
government can pump you full of a drug, what do you have? You
are powerless. You got nothing. They have you. They can do with
you what they want. That's what's got me in such a bad mood
today. I feel that we're at an inflection point. And it's going
to be happening this fall and winter. And how the United
States reacts to all of this, I think is what's going to push
the future. They've already instituted the passport
sanitaire in France, even though people were marching in the
streets. In Italy, they were burning vaccine cards. But they
still pass their vaccine passport. Is it going to happen
here? They're pushing for it. And when that FDA approval comes
down for Pfizer, we'll see what happens. And I think that's, I
think that's the inflection point we're at now. Hopefully,
I'm wrong. Hopefully I see a better day in the coming weeks
because this shits got me pissed off. And that's that's also
partly why I want to change my podcast name to spitting in the
wind because this entire 15 minutes or so of my ranting is
exactly that just spitting in the wind. Just throwing shit out
there just going right back into my face. Not gonna change a
goddamn thing. That's the feel good for this week. Anyway, I'm
gonna end it here. Just to let you know, this is a podcast,
going into the push for podcasting 2.0. After all of
that bullshit, there's a podcasting 2.0 compatible
podcast. So that means that if you're using one of the new
podcast apps at new podcast apps.com you can see the
transcript and chapter chapter images chapter links if I have
any. You can also stream satoshis to this if you found
this uplifting and entertaining by using one of the apps that
are value enabled and you feel like shoving a few satoshis into
your wallet. But that's it for this week. That's all I got
spitting in the wind, whatever the fuck it is.
Let's hope next week I'm in a better mood. Alright, everybody
have a good week. Talk to you later.
I really didn't feel like doing this today. But I got through
it. It's depressing, but I need to get it out. Sometimes. It's
really spurned by people wearing masks all by themselves walking
around. I just, I don't get it. I don't understand it.
Really calling it Have a good week. Bye bye.