Kevin Bae: This is Kevin.
I'm just gonna kind of launch right into things right now.
Every week seems to be getting nuttier. No you're and nuttier.
So this straight up from let's see the videos from fox news but
the pastor up in Canada, bravest man in North America, they
finally caught him. And it's kind of unbelievable what
they're doing. calling them Gestapo psychopaths. They're
arresting him on the street on the highway. They're dragging
him away the Canadian police just dragging a pastor. That man
appeared on Fox News. offski joins me now Patrick Ingram.
It's crazy. There. I blogged about him over the past few
weeks, and then everybody else has as well where the armed
police meet him at his church door. And he screamed at them
calling them Nazi Gestapo, which really that's what they are. You
didn't think that we would make it to another time where police
would be shuttering a church under the guise of Public Safety
and Health with COVID-19 and the Coronavirus. This man is, you
know, publicly been fighting them and he's out of jail right
now from what I understand. But it's just, it's just nuts. There
was another. I don't believe this is the same church. The
church of god in almer, or aylmer. I don't know how they
pronounce it up in Canada. But there was another church service
where the police came and marched in. And they shut them
down, shut them down, and then lock the doors. There's a video
on Twitter. In this video here, you could hear the the
congregation singing. And in the video, you've got maybe about 10
police officers walking down the driveway, they didn't park in,
in the parking lot of the church, but they're marching.
You know, it would be great if they were goose stepping, but
they're just marching through the parking lot through the
driveway, and they're heading towards the church. The person
taking the video is just right now he's outside in the parking
lot. And he's showing the police coming, please are armed.
Believe it or not, they have their flak jackets on. They do
not have helmets, at least no right here and to lock the doors
here. Here's their ration. So you get the church. So
conservative Christian church seems they almost look like
they're Amish. But you know, these are harmless people. And
they're singing their church hymns. And the police are
outside with their warrants and their guns, as a group of
parishioners are all videotaping.
It's all kind of crazy to think that this is Canada. So here,
let's see for the video a little bit. You got the Please forgive
them for the pastor saying that he's going to be praying for the
police. Saying that they don't know what they're doing. You
know, obviously they don't, these are supposed to be members
of the community. You're supposed to have religious
freedom in Canada. Probably known as a syrup. Here's the
police officer or order here today, requiring the sheer
Unknown: existence of the police to vacate everyone from the
building. And we will be locked into the building. Ask for your
Kevin Bae: respectful assistance in this and everyone leave
please in an order that was peaceful. Nobody raised their
hand. Nobody really protested anything. You know, it was all
verbal by the pastor. But yet they're in the church with
bulletproof vests on and guns in order to shut down a church
service. So everybody moved out, left the building peacefully.
Then the pastor gave a little speech in front of the front of
the church doors and then as the congregation met outs He
proceeded to continue given freedoms to preach
Unknown: our God given freedoms came by the church came by the
Christians. And when the Christians fell asleep, and they
let these things slip, this is what happens. And this is the
beginning of
Kevin Bae: this has to be nobody thought that this was gonna
happen. It was, we were all told that we're all ridiculous
conspiracy theorists for 14 months I've preached but here it
is all on the people. I haven't seen it in the United States,
but in Canada, in Canada, it's a definite thing now. So they are
shutting down churches, they're locking the doors, in the name
of public health. Nobody is allowed to take risks for
themselves or assess things themselves, and is part of
what's going on. I'm living in the Atlanta, Georgia area. And,
you know, Georgia right now in the United States is famous for,
it's only 25% of the population being vaccinated. So 75% of
people here are withholding waiting or just playing that
going to get it for some reason. So the reports in the news in
the Atlanta Journal Constitution have all been surrounding
guilting people into getting a vaccination. And there's a story
that happened today that appeared in the newspaper that I
did not blog these things yet, because they were just fresh.
reporting about how things are opening up and about how people
spent spent the day like without without their masks. Here's one
here, Adrian gress gerwitz. She arrived at the great harvest
bread company in Milton wearing a mask, I guess previous it says
here on Thursday, she would have worn a mask. But Friday was
different. Less than 24 hours after the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention significantly relaxed COVID-19
guidelines for vaccinated Americans. She shed her face
covering it's liberating she said, who is vaccinated. It's
just a little more comfortable to be out. Really. So you know,
you know, when you've walked into a place, and people are
behaving normal, over a disease, that 99.9% not only survive, but
you know, really don't have lasting complications from this.
And you see people acting normal and you're and you have a
reaction to it. You've been propagandized into fear. So this
whole this whole story is about different people throughout
Atlanta, about how they're vaccinated. And now they're they
feel so good that the CDC has given them permission to go out
and about and take off their mask. There you got some people
as well. They're saying, Well, I'm vaccinated. But I don't know
who else is out there isn't? We don't know. There's a lot of
people aren't unvaccinated. So what sense does it make what
logical sense does it make that if you have been vaccinated
against a disease and you run into somebody that has not been
vaccinated, who's at risk? Why would you be at risk? Why? Why
would you continue to wear a mask? If the other person isn't
vaccinated, we all have choices now. The vaccines are all out
there. They're free, you can make an appointment go get them.
It's Matter of fact, they're more vaccines out there than
people that want to get them. So this is now this now comes down
to a personal choice. If you don't want to get it, you don't
have to get it. If you want to get it, go get it. There's
nothing stopping you. You can protect yourself. If you feel
you're at high risk. You can protect yourself. So there was
another story about a group of scientists calling for further
inquiry into the origins of the Coronavirus and I blogged about
this one earlier in the week. I'm trying to find it now.
Let's see. I can't remember now where the heck it was. But yeah,
there there were there was a an article on medium and that one
covered Oh, wow. I you know, I I blogged more than I thought I
did. I cannot find it right now. But I remember was an article on
medium. And it went through in detail in great detail whether
or not the Coronavirus was created in a lab or just found
found in nature or the heck is it? I can't believe I can't find
it. I know I blocked it anyway. So it this is reported in New
York time. So hopefully, there's something happening there. You
know, if, if the New York Times is jumping in on this bandwagon,
something has to be up, because they've been so pro who and so
Pro, nothing to see here. This is something that moved from a
bat to people. That it's it's kind of surprising. So 18
scientists stated Thursday in a letter published in the journal
Science, that there's not enough evidence to decide whether a
natural origin or accidental laboratory leak caused the
pandemic. That's true. And the medium article did say that, you
know, there is no definitive proof one way or the other. But
the, you know, if you're looking for a preponderance of evidence,
there are features of SARS covi. Two that have never been found
in a wild type virus. It's only been found in lab created
viruses of viruses created to test whether or not virus you
know a particular virus can be transmitted to people. So there
seems to be a smoking gun, whether it will amount to
anything who knows. But in other news, let's see more scientists
argue against the need against argue against the need for
COVID-19 booster shots. So interviews and interviews with
Reuters This is from Yahoo Finance more than a dozen
influential infection, infectious disease and vaccine
development experts. So there's a growing evidence that a first
round of global vaccinations may offer enduring protection
against the Coronavirus and its most worrisome variants
discovered to date, some of these scientists expressed
concern that public expectations around COVID-19 boosters are
being set by pharmaceutical executives rather than health
specialists. Follow the experts. Although many agreed that
preparing for such a need as a precaution was prudent. So they
had to sort of cover their ass with that one. So in other
words, you know, a booster shots probably not going to be
necessary, you know, but I do suspect this is going to be the
flu shot where every year, every single year, you're going to be
pushed to get this. Let's move on to Arizona, Arizona and the
audit. Things are what the heck is going on. I got a I got a dog
making a lot of noise. So I do this podcast in my office, my
home office and it keeps the door closed. I got three dogs in
here. Because if they hear stuff outside, then they're going to
go running around and maybe barking so I try to keep it as
quiet as possible. But my Labrador is for some reason,
either having a dream or twitching uncontrollably down
there. Anyway, the Arizona audit it's possible that Democrats
could be in some trouble if the reporting on this is true so
far. The Democrats refusing to comply with court subpoenas. And
there are Chain of Custody anomalies and database deletions
from hard drives. Which doesn't sound very good does it know. So
in this article from reported by Cheryl akkad, Atkins Attkisson,
that's her name, actress and I can never pronounce her name
properly.
According she says according to a letter from Karen ban,
president of the Arizona State Senate sent to the Maricopa
Board of Supervisors the county continues to flout valid
legislative subpoenas refusing to hand over virtual images of
routers. The county also has allegedly failed to provide the
passwords necessary to access vote tabulation devices for the
audit. A second issue flagged by the audit has to do with
anomalies in Chain of Custody process for ballots. The letter
says the country has yet to provide Chain of Custody
documentation. bags for storing the ballots were not sealed.
batch dividers are missing and ballot boxes were sealed with
regular tape rather than tamper evident seals. The third issue
mentioned is the alleged deletion of the entire database
directory from the D drive of the machine szene ms primary,
that would mean subpoena data has been removed. According to
the audit, there is no evidence that the main database for all
election related data for the 2020 general election has been
moved as has been removed. So there's some definite problems
whether or not this amounts to anything who knows, but it's
just interesting than the less. We had Rand Paul coming out and
coming after St. Fauci again, which was kind of nice. And
let's see here. Oh, wait, I think I found the article the
medium article. Yeah, I titled it SARS Coby to created by
nature or nurture. And it was a science writer. And the writer
was previously a writer for the science writer for The New York
Times, amongst other publications. And he looked at
all the arguments for and against SARS, kobie to being lab
created. The kicker is, though nobody questioned the argument.
It's a long, detailed article, and it is worth the read from
from that article. Here is quoting What the heck is his
name? I can't, you know, I didn't I didn't put his name
down. Anyway, the article is linked on my blog. So you can
read it is a long read. From the article science is supposedly a
self correcting community of experts who constantly check
each other's work. So why didn't other virologist point out that
the Anderson group's argument was fully absurdly large, full
of absurdly large holes. Perhaps because in today's universities
speech can be very costly. Careers can be destroyed for
stepping out of line. Any virologist who challenges the
community's declared view risks having his next grant
application turned down by the panel of fellow virologists that
advises the government grant distribution agency. The data
sack and Anderson letters were really political, not scientific
statements, yet were amazingly effective. articles in the
mainstream press repeatedly stated that a consensus of
experts had ruled lab escape out of the question or extremely
unlikely. Their authors relied for the most part on the dagen
Anderson letters, failing to understand the yawning gaps in
their arguments. Mainstream newspapers all have science
journalists on their staff as do major networks. And these
specialists reporters are supposed to be able to question
scientists and check their assertions, but the NASDAQ and
Andersen assertions went largely unchallenged. What else does
this sound like? This sounds exactly like the climate change
argument. Don't you think? You know, you have there are
scientists out there that challenge the premise of the
manmade climate change argument. Some of them do admit that, you
know, the Earth is getting warmer. But they they say that
there is not enough evidence as to whether or not man is
responsible. And they also say they do not know if in fact, it
is a bad thing. But it's it's difficult to get that kind of
news out there. It's just flooded with the other climate
change is going to end the world we need to stop it now. shut
down all economic activity, which is also very similar to
SARS, Coby to an COVID, the COVID mass hysteria. So, you
know, if you're not allowed to question anything, what do we
have? If you're not allowed to be skeptical, and try to get
down to the root cause? Or maybe you have a different idea? Or
you have different evidence, if nobody's willing to look at it,
you know, what, what's happening to us? So if the heading back to
COVID, if the SARS could be to virus was created in a lab,
it may be that the American taxpayer funded it. How does
that make you feel and that the then I'll go back to the Rand
Paul video cuz that's what this is about. In the medium article,
this author says, by a strange twist in the story, a scientist
work was funded by the NIH, or I'm sorry, the ni and I ID to
many acronyms, the National Institute of Allergy and
Infectious Diseases, and it's part of the NIH and grant
proposals funded her work which are a matter of public records
specifically, on what you plan to do with the money. I'm sorry,
a specify and specify exactly what you plan to do with money.
The grants worksite were assigned to the prime
contractor, Dr. datsik of the Eco Health Alliance. He also
helped With the investigation as to whether or not this was lab
created, so there's a conflict of interest and he subcontracted
them to a doctor. She the doctor, she is this doctor in
China. That is the chief person I guess that controls their
Coronavirus research. Here are extracts from the grants for
fiscal years 2018 and 2019. co v Cove stands for Coronavirus and
S for protein which refers to the viruses spike test
predictions of Cove interspecies transmission. predictive models
of host range will be tested experimentally using reverse
genetics, pseudo virus and receptor building essays and
virus infection experiments across a range of cell cultures
from different species and humanized mice. We will use s
protein sequence data, infectious clone technology in
vitro and in vivo infection experiments and analysis of
receptor binding to test the hypothesis that percentage
divergence thresholds and s protein sequences predict
spillover potential. He says what this means in non technical
languages that doctor she set out to create novel
coronaviruses with the highest possible infectivity for human
cells. Her plan was to take genes that coded for spike
proteins, possessing a variety of measured affinities for human
cells ranging from high to low. She would insert these by genes
one by one into the backbone of a number of viral genomes,
reverse genetics and infectious clone technology, creating a
series of kemetic viruses. These kemetic viruses would then be
tested for their ability to attack human cell cultures and
humanized mice. And this information would help predict
the likelihood of spillover the jump of a Coronavirus from bats
to people. So China's leading expert on bat viruses was funded
by the NIH. Quite possibly. But we can't investigate whether or
not the virus came from her lab doctor she's lab because her
records are sealed. So the now infamous lab in Wu Han, or
Wuhan, they study these viruses in their lab, and their safety
precautions were a joke. This is also from the article before
2020. The rules followed by a virologist in China and
elsewhere required that experiments with the SARS one
and MERS viruses be conducted in BSL three condition. And I
forgot what BSL stands for I think is a biosafety level, so
biosafety level three conditions, but all other bat
coronaviruses could be studied in BSL two. So these are the
higher the number, the higher the protection level. The next
this is one level down from BSL three. BSL two requires taking
fairly minimal safety precautions such as wearing lab
coat, lab coats and gloves, not sucking up liquids in a pipette
and putting up biohazard warnings yet and assign a
function experiment conducted in BSL two might produce an agent
more infectious than either SARS one ormers, and if it did, then
lab workers would stand a high chance of infection, especially
unvaccinated. So much of her work on these gain of function
Coronavirus is not the gain of function. coronaviruses are the
ones where they change the virus itself to see how it will infect
or try to produce one that will infect a human being eat more
easily. She performed her testing at BSL two. And
according to this author, BSL two.
It would pose an unacceptably high risk of infection. Because
the standard of the standard of safety, the biosafety level of
BSL two is equivalent to the standards used in a US dental
dentist's office. So Isn't that funny? They're conducting
experiments in a lab of highly infectious diseases, where
they're not really taking any precautions. They're not
wearing, you know, you know, bunny suits clean. They're not
working in clean rooms. They're just simple mask, simple glove,
some lab coats so they could easily get infected. Oh, and I
don't know, I don't understand why they talk about vaccination
because vaccines didn't exist at the time for these things, but
it's neither here nor there. So it's it's a very long article
and it seems that Dr. Fauci could have been partly
responsible. And this part of the story is near the end of
that article. So you'll know you have to go down there and read
it. But here he says, the responsibility of the NIH ID and
NIH is even more acute because for the first three years that
they grant to eco Health Alliance, there was a moratorium
on funding gain of function research. Why didn't the two
agencies therefore halt the federal funding as apparently
required to do so by law? So it was against the law to do this,
but somebody wrote a loophole into the moratorium. He goes on
to say the moratorium specifically barred funding of
any gain of function research that increase the pathogenesis c
pathogenicity of the flu MERS or SARS viruses. But then a
footnote on page two of the moratorium document states that
an exception from the research pause may be obtained at the
head of the USG funding agency determines that the research is
urgently necessary to protect the public health or national
security. This seems to mean that either the the director of
the NIH ID, Dr. Fauci or the director of the NIH, Dr. Francis
Collins, or maybe both would have invoked the footnote in
order to keep the money flowing to Dr. She's gaining function
research. So wouldn't that be just the biggest kick in the
freakin pants that the world shut down, the US economy shut
down, your lives have been shut down. And if the number of
people that they say died by COVID-19 is accurate, that it
could have possibly been funded by us, the American taxpayer and
approved by the nation's love, you know, beloved Dr. Anthony
Fauci, that would be the ultimate kick in the pants.
Unknown: Here's Rand Paul. so crazy thing, because if this
happened because of the NIH funding, and that came from Dr.
Fauci, and then this is a globe,
Kevin Bae: don't watch Fox News.
Unknown: Now he's in charge of the responses. from Fox News.
The irony of that, what do you make of that?
There's Rand Paul, it's even worse than you make out the
person they appointed to investigate the lab, from the
who perspective is the guy who gave the money. So NIH gave the
money to a group called eco health. This is part of what you
just reported from named vertical. They got him to
investigate whether Wu Han was doing anything inappropriate in
their lab. But if they were wouldn't he then be culpable. So
Doesn't he have a self interest in smoothing things over? I'm
not saying he did cover things up. But you wouldn't appoint
someone who's in the line of supply chain of giving the money
to them? Because ultimately, here's the rub. I don't know
whether it came from the lab. Nobody knows whether it came
from the lab. But who would be culpable. Dr. falchi could be
culpable for the entire pandemic Soca doctor says Anke does Anke
and kotian. Dr. Shi, I don't know. But you wouldn't put the
people who gave the money to the Wu Han lab in charge of the
investigation that looks like a cover up.
Kevin Bae: And you're not really hearing this anywhere else. I
mean, other than Rand Paul, and that article from medium. This
has been I haven't read about this. I read the Chicago
Tribune, The Wall Street Journal and The Atlanta Journal
Constitution. I'm from Chicago. So I keep up with what's going
on there. I'm living I now live in Atlanta. So I try to find
out, you know, what's going on here. And the Wall Street
Journal covers national news and businesses, which you know, I
like to follow. And none of them other than Rand Paul. And the
article on medium has covered this in any meaningful way. Oh,
I lost my place. I close the wrong tab on my browser. So it's
kind of amazing if that if that's true. It's amazing. And
it's kind of sad. Let's see, what else do I have here? This
is nine COVID. Large us banks poised to loosen requirements to
get credit cards. That's bad news. This smacks of the housing
crisis. Hopefully on a smaller scale where can't crash a world
economy? But you know what, what are they going to do here,
they're going to start giving credit cards to people who maybe
normally couldn't get it. And what they're going to do is
they're going to use they're they're going to banks are going
to share information between each other. Regarding people's
balances and payment habits. I don't know how much of a privacy
violation any of that stuff is. But they're going to use that
information to have some different type of credit score
for people who are having trouble getting credit cards,
and it may be good for some people, you know, some people
crawling out of debt or maybe they had some some financial
mishap you know, and they need to get a credit card again, and
I understand the need for cards. But some people really you
shouldn't, they shouldn't have it just like people before
should not have had mortgages, some of them. They had mortgages
on houses, where they were getting a mortgage that was like
somewhere in you know, 90% of 90 95% of the value of the
house, there was no equity there. And then when the real
estate market bubble burst, suddenly they were underwater,
their house was worth less than what they owed. And that's how
we ended up having a lot of these, these problems. So what's
going to happen here, when you have a whole host of people
getting credit cards, and then they can't pay them back? They
lose a job, the economy tanks? And now who's going to be
responsible? Are they going to sell this debt? like they did
with mortgages? Are they going to package them together and
sell them off to other companies? And I just I just
don't see this as a good thing, you know, people should have to
have the capacity to repay their debts before they're given lines
of credit. Oh, let's see. Okay. Well, there were hearings in
Congress, about January 6. You know, you have one side, which
are the Trump haters, and they're totally irrational. You
have the other side that are Trump lovers, which are equally
totally irrational. But here's the thing with January 6. This
is, I believe, the United States is Tiananmen Square, incident,
as it's known in China. The Oh no, they call it the, what do
they call it, they call it. They call it an incident, I can't
remember now, but they call it an incident rather than in some
Wikipedia. Rather than a massacre, which it's called
everywhere else in the world. It's called the Tiananmen Square
Massacre. In the Tiananmen Square Massacre event, there
were hundreds, perhaps even 1000s, nobody knows exactly for
sure, there's been no official count. And the Chinese
government doesn't really admit to it. People were killed by the
Chinese government, because they wanted to shut down the protests
that were happening there. And the Chinese government,
basically shut down all media, and produced an official
narrative of what happened, and they would not deviate. They did
not allow anybody to report it as anything other than that.
There were journalists that were fired. There were journalists
that were jailed.
They removed images, videos, articles from the web, or
they've blocked it in China, you know, using the Great Wall of
China. So in China, the Tiananmen Square Massacre that
the rest of the world knows never happened. So this, this is
a case where something did happen, but they're using the
media to their advantage to say it never happened. Now, in our
case, with January 6, we're being told by the media, we're
being told by the democrats or the Trump haters out there, that
January 6, was an armed insurrection, that the
government was trying to be overthrown, that it was a bloody
and deadly coup attempt. This is what we're being told. And this
is the farthest thing from the truth. The farthest thing from
the truth. I watched it that day. I watched it unfold live on
TV. And you know, I blogged this again, I put the videos back up
because surprisingly, NBC hasn't even taken their video down.
There's a video and it's one of the first ones and I remember
watching this as the people broke through and there was a
camera crew inside. Already streaming live video, I was
watching the PBS news hour. And you just see this large group of
people walking through the Capitol. In between the ropes,
they have the area roped off. And I've never heard of an armed
insurrection. That walked peacefully through ropes in
between the ropes. They didn't even knock them down. They
weren't knocking down statues. They weren't tearing paintings
off the wall. You know that's not to say things didn't get
out. control with some of the people there things definitely
get out of control. They shouldn't have been in there in
the building in the first place. But regardless, we're being told
them when you hear armed insurrection, when you hear
insurrection, when you hear, you know, all this coup attempt,
baloney, you know, the images in your head, are you've got people
running around with maybe ar fifteens, you know, or, or, you
know, even just nine millimeter handguns, you know, running
through the halls of the Capitol and Congress, you know, trying
to, you know, find Congress people and hold them hostage.
That isn't that what happened? Let me see if I remember this is
public. This is from NBC last night. Because of the pandemic
this has been right now you can see people on this video breach
means that there are every single carrying American flags
and screen calmly and even widely spaced ready breach
walking between the ropes, where you have, they're taking videos
with their phones, they're taking selfies and they're
taking pictures, and then you have Capitol Police. Standing by
the side, your bags are checked, and police do a sweep of what
you bring into the Capitol. This has to be the most peaceful
interaction ever recorded. History, I have to say, I mean,
you know, that was the NBC one then there's another video in
the rotunda. You can hear all the people there, but they're
just standing there. They're standing there milling around.
They're having a chat. And you got the Capitol Police standing
on the side, just watching them. Some of them are just having
conversations with people. You need to go look these things up
if you haven't seen them. This is not an armed insurrection.
This is a group of people that wanted to protest the government
over the election that believed that there were some election
irregularities and that nobody was doing anything to try to
find out what the problem was. But the media is not telling you
that the media is telling you legacy media and this goes the
legacy media is not just television, radio, newspapers,
it's also social media, Facebook, Twitter, they are now
considered to me legacy media because they all repeat the same
thing. And if you try to go beyond those means at least
Facebook and Twitter, maybe even Instagram, they you know, Shadow
ban you they silence you so and they're doing you a disservice.
They're not telling you the truth. And while it you know,
there was there was violence there. There was definitely one
person there killed, shot and killed Ashley Babbitt. There was
another I think it was a woman that was trampled. And it was a
person that was trampled. I don't believe it was in the
building, I believe it was outside and died from injuries
being trampled, the rest of it was
assigned sideshow. They did not die as a direct result of any
violence that happened that day. So the media also telling you
that five people died during a bloody insurrection a bloody
coup attempt. That's a lie. It's an out and out lie. And it's
it's like you see the two worlds. It's, it's pretty
disturbing when you're on the outside looking into it. And you
have people that just they hate Trump so much, and they want to
believe it so badly, that he inspired a coup attempt. Let's
put aside to that. He, on January 6, President Trump was
still president. So it's impossible to have a coup
attempt on yourself. Now, you could say that, you know, these
people were trying to stop the count there because of that was
at the time when the electoral college was meeting and they
were tallying the electors. So you could say they were trying
to stop the count, delay, the count all these kinds of things,
you know, that's at the worst. You know, did they break into
Pelosi office? Yes. Did they, you know, cause some damage?
Yes. But it was not a coup attempt. Nobody almost died in
Congress. Vice President Pence wasn't almost hanged. No, that
stuff happened. None of it. But you're being told it did. And
you're being told repeatedly over and over and over again
until one day it's just gonna be Yeah, it happened. It was the
insurrection. You know, we're almost there already. This is
like the the Trump fine people Bologna, where they claimed he
said that Nazis were fine. People were very fine people,
which is not what he said at all. As a matter of fact, he
said the exact opposite. But yet you were told from the moment it
happened, because they were able to isolate that one soundbite
and not give you the full context that people thought it
actually happened. And that's the power of the media. off of
that little bit, we have Apple Apple Computer. they parted ways
with an employee because a bunch of employees wrote a letter to
Apple saying that they don't see they don't feel safe. Why don't
they feel safe for this one from this one employee because he
wrote a book in 2018 where he said some things that they
believe are massage earnest. Here's the quote. The guy's name
is Garcia Martinez. And he did respond on Twitter the other
day, you know, basically saying that Facebook fired him because
there were no there was no reporting on whether or not he
was fired. Because it was being reported that they just decided
to part ways which makes it seem like it was voluntary. But Mr.
Garcia wrote in his book that most women in the Bay Area are
soft and weak. cosseted and naive despite their claims of
worldliness and generally full of shit. In other passages, he
referred to women based on his attraction to their bodies and
said most women at Facebook and in the Bay Area didn't know how
to dress. And another passage dealing with fundraising he said
an equity round is having to convince five women to do a six
on with you. This is how it was reported by the Wall Street
Journal. Matt Taibbi writing an article and substack he knows
Mr. Martinez. And he went through he wrote a long article
outlining the book, what Garcia was referring to, and put it in
better context. And that even let's just say the claims are
accurate that he wrote something massage monistic in a book in
2018. There's no evidence that he did any of this stuff. At a
workplace. There's no evidence that he did any of this at
Apple. So what is the fireable offense? This is Apple just
strictly virtue signaling. For some reason. Maybe they just
didn't want they want it to explode. But Garcia, Garcia
Martinez, he wrote on Twitter that he was recruited by Apple,
he didn't seek the job there. They recruited him, they wanted
him to go there. He sold his house in Washington, he moved
down there. He changed his entire life to go and work at
Apple.
And within days, it turned around, people write some stupid
letter. And he's out. Now, I've done business in California.
California has some extremely strong labor laws. To me, he
should sue. He should sue for wrongful termination. He should
sue them for libel and slander. And just go after him because
what they did was not right. He had, there was no fireable
offense, he did nothing in the workplace. And the kicker here
is Apple's just disgusting statement. Here's their
statement at Apple we've always strived to create an inclusive,
welcoming workplace where everyone is respected and
accepted. Unless you write a book in 2018, and say something
that might be misogynistic behavior that demeans or
discriminates to get discriminates against people for
who they are, has no place here. So they could discriminate for
against this guy because he has he made some so called
misogynistic statements in a book. They can discriminate
against him. I was that legal? It shouldn't be. Apple needs to
be called out on the carpet for that, and he needs to get a lot
of money. Let's see, we get inflation news. Inflation is all
over the place. I think it's a temporary spike that's largely
created by the shutdown of everything in the world. So
there's some pent up demand and there's too much money in
circulation right now. I expect that's going to work itself out
over the next few months. The inflation we got to worry about
is next year and the year after that. When all this money that's
still working its way through the system doesn't go away. And
we continue to have a lot of money chasing too few goods,
that's going to be a problem. Back to COVID. There was let's
see, there was a hearing up in Canada up in Winnipeg. And they
were talking about the PCR tests. The chief microbiologist
up there. Chief microbiologist and laboratory specialists, Dr.
Jared Bullard. He was a witness for the Manitoba government. And
when he was questioned under oath, he acknowledged that the
PCR tests have significant limitations. He admitted that
PCR tests do not verify infectiousness, and we're never
intended to be used diagnose respiratory illnesses. In
addition to all of that, he testified that samples tested at
a cycle threshold of over 25, at least up in Canada, they're
produced no viable virus, and samples tested at a cycle
threshold of 18 only produced 44% of positive samples. That
means that, at a lower threshold have a side effect cycle
threshold with a PCR test of 18. Only 56% are not only but only
44%, tested, positive and 56% majority tested negative, those
people were not considered infectious. Meanwhile, in
Manitoba, they've been testing at cycle thresholds of at least
40, which is exactly the same as as has been going on down here
in the United States. So it's impossible to know from the
numbers that they give whether or not anybody is infectious. At
a cycle threshold of 4042 that I've seen with the FDA, they'll
be able to find any fraction, any little piece of a virus of
SARS COVID. And then you know, that positive test then we'll
say your your infectious when you are most likely not. We had
the trouble in the Middle East with Israel and the Palestinians
once again, which we haven't seen this in a while. You know,
Trump had things seemingly under control with the Abraham accords
and moving the US embassy to Jerusalem. Things were I don't
recall things being that quiet in the Middle East my entire
life. So we have fighting going back and forth now. And there
was a video that I saw on Twitter of the Israeli Iron
Dome.
This, this is somebody on Twitter. And it just looks like
a bunch of fireflies flying up into the sky and you get little
flashes of light where their Iron Dome defense system is
meeting the incoming rockets from the Palestinians, and just
blowing them out of the sky before they ever land. It's kind
of incredible video. That's pretty amazing. Let's see, let's
move on here. john stossel had a video that he came out with in
talking about welfare for the rich. You know, I'm against all
government subsidies, whether it's for business, whether it's
for people, you know, the federal government doesn't have
any business taking money from one person and handing it to
another. But you know, in my sarcastic way, you know, I'm
against all where all welfare unless the UBI is passed
universal basic income, then give me my share, because it
will please me to no end, that the younger generations that
have been calling for universal basic income will have to pay me
pay me for doing nothing that would make me very happy. Let's
see then I have my story about the nature versus nurture. Oh,
there was an article in the Atlanta Journal, it was an
opinion piece by a woman. She is a young woman in college. And
she's was obviously abused by the education system. Perhaps
she is abused by somebody mentally because she cannot
reconcile being a half Asian. That's what I am. I'm a half
breed. I'm half Korean, half white. My father is from Korea,
South Korea and my mother, her family his immediate family's
from upstate New York and the extended family. It comes from
Quebec, Canada. And then from there beyond there it goes to
France. So I'm half white and half Korean half breed as I like
to say which It's not a popular thing these days to say. It's
just it's so disheartening. Here's what she says from her
opinion piece. On on my most recent phone call with my
parents, we were lamenting the fatal attacks on six Asian women
in Atlanta, our hometown. Both my parents Express grief and
outrage over what seems Zena phobic hate crime. But in a
sudden tone shift, my dad expressed his gratitude for my
mother's whiteness. He said, I'm glad mom is white to help you
and trailed off realizing the gravity of this statement. If If
any of that is true, his parents either don't understand or, you
know, are part of the problem here. Because I lived I've lived
54 years as a half Asian. And this girl, she's in college, so
she's, you know, got to be in her lower 20s. You can't tell
me, people are more racist today than they were when I was
growing up back in the late 60s, early 70s. Nobody knew what I
was. I didn't really give it down. People ask me all the
time. What are you Where are you from? What's your nationality? I
never took offense to that. You know, especially back then,
there were not very many half breeds. At least half Asians
have Koreans. In in, in my hometown of Chicago. In the the
phonebook, which we used to use back then the white pages, my
family had the only last name Bay in the phonebook. Ba there
were other Koreans in Chicago there were Kim's in parks and
chosen choice. But no base we were the only ones. And you
know, I never took offense to that. I never took offense to
people wondering what I was because you really couldn't
tell. You know, my eyes are not all that slanted. You know,
depending on the time of year, my skin is either brown or or
very white. My hair's black. My eyes are brown. I mean, I could
pass for Mexican I could pass for Native American I could pass
for half Asian, which, you know, is what I am. But she she writes
this long article about
how she's kind of afraid, like is she white enough, is half
white, white enough. And her family is like afraid of her
getting killed or beaten out on the street because she's half
Asian. Here's a little bit more from her article to my dad.
However, I appear safe I appear in conspicuous if I walk quickly
enough past the racist, they won't be able to place my
ethnicity in time to start throwing rocks and punches. I
did not inherit the gentle eyes that join in the corners like
those of my grandparents. My hair is a few shades lighter
than my dad's Stark black hair. My skin is tan. But only in the
summer, when everyone else is getting darker to her pictures
in the paper. She looks more Asian than I do. If I if I saw
her on the street, I would definitely know she's Asian, or
at least half. Never once in my life was I worried about walking
down the street unless I was in a particularly bad neighborhood
was I worried about anybody trying to punch me or throw
rocks because of what it looked like. And I'm walking around
Atlanta here at the Atlanta area all the time. And I'm running in
the you know, just about everybody we've dealt with my
wife and I since we moved here, my wife is full Filipino.
Everybody has been nice. There's been zero racism pointed toward
us toward us. And so let's say let's say some of the people
we've dealt with, let's say they are racist. It wasn't overt. You
know, whatever it was they kept it in check. that there has been
literally nobody now I know there's been incidents in the
news of Asians getting beaten. You know, primarily, they've
been in higher crime areas in New York City, San Francisco,
Los Angeles. And the shootings that they talked about here in
Atlanta. I don't believe those were racially motivated. I
believe it was a nut Nut Job guy that was shooting up a massage
parlor because they were massage parlors. I don't believe that
was an act of hashtag Asian hate. But this this woman here
she had to be abused in the school system, to believe that
white people are are so racist, that they're going to see her
walking down the street, peg her as an Asian and start throwing
rocks and punches. That's ridiculous. Not only that people
who are any ethnicity black, brown, Asian, you know, yellow
as they like to say. There, there's no way you can tell me
that racism is worse today than it wasn't when my father came to
the, to this country, he came to the United States in the
50s 1950s. He didn't speak English, he didn't have any
money. He had a scholarship to a university in Central Illinois.
So he came here in the central Illinois in the 1950s was
nothing but white. And he tells the stories all the time about
his professors, and the people he met there, the people that he
worked in the summers with, they were all white. But they all
treated him well. He wasn't getting punched and getting
rocks thrown at him then. You know, and throughout all the
racism you know that people like to tout from the 50s on up. It
should have been impossible for him to have done anything in
this world. Because he was being held back and held down by the
white man by the white patriarchy. Okay, he's a man. So
I guess he could be part of the patriarchy just not part of the
white part. I don't know if you can hear that click clack of my
dog's nails. He's walking around. But my father being full
Korean, was able to live the American dream, the real
American dream. He came from nothing, and built it all
himself to where he became a multi millionaire. All using his
brain, the sweat of his brow, and his hard work. Anybody who
came here after that, as far more advantages and he had this
young Asian woman here in Atlanta, I think she's in
Marietta. Going to college, she's half Japanese. Somehow she
feels so oppressed. That she feels she can't make it in this
world. Now, how is that not abuse? How is it abuse?
You know, she talks about identifying as Asian, when
people ask her how about identifying as an American, she
also gets the concept of the American melting pot
incorrectly. She thinks that the American melting pot is exists,
you know, as a concept to erase cultural and linguistic
differences. Nothing could be farther from the truth there.
She has been taught to hate her own country. The idea of the
American melting pot is that people from all over the world
from different cultures, different societies, different
religions, different everything can come here and coexist side
by side. That doesn't mean you cast anything aside. You know,
my father never gave up speaking Korean. I don't speak Korean
because my mother's white. So you know, Korean was never
spoken in the home. But my younger brother and sister from
my father's second marriage, they grew up speaking Korean.
You know, they don't really do it anymore. But Korean culture
wasn't buried to them. You know, the Koreans here in Atlanta,
they have a giant community here. Nobody's trying to
suppress the Korean culture. Nobody's trying to suppress the
Japanese culture, the Mexican culture. You know, or the
Europeans that came here, the Polish, the Irish, the Jewish,
the Germans. Nobody's trying to suppress any of that culture. In
the United States celebrates that type of culture, we
celebrate the fact that people can, you can have a Jewish
person and an Arab person living next door, side by side. And
they're not launching rockets at each other. They may not like
each other, they may love each other. Who knows. But the fact
is, we can all live together here. So the problems that she
feels, to me, were created by the media and created by her the
education system here, where they don't teach you properly.
What the American Dream is. They don't teach you properly about
the Constitution. They don't teach you properly about what
cultural diversity really is. You know, or what, what the
American melting pot is. Instead, you're taught that all
white people are evil, and they're all trying to suppress
you. And that's wrong. That's abuse. So I had an article, it
was it was a article about the Chinese census and about their
population. And I got this one so wrong. It was kind of
hilarious. When I was reading it, I thought I read that, that
the Chinese population increased their population by 72 million
every year. And I was like, Whoa, that's a huge number. And
that's why I posted that every 4.6 years, China grows by us.
And that's considered slow. was wrong, it was a decade. So every
10 years, every 10 years, their population seems to increase by
72 million. And I guess it's slowing down. They had their one
child per family policy, and they've dropped that they want
people to have more babies. But still 72 million people over 10
years. So you know, the replaces every 46 years, not 4.6. But
still, that's pretty fast. I think us only has 330 million
people. So you know, they may not care in China, whether or
not they can support their social programs. Because it's a
communist nation. There's no such thing as true private
property. If the government wants that they can take it. So
I don't know how much that census report really means
anything. NPR had a story where so they reported this without
actually reporting it that COVID-19 lockdowns may be
responsible for over 400,000 deaths. The CDC isn't has the
number of deaths due to COVID. In the US at the time when I
blogged this at 570,520. NPR reported on a new study that
estimates over 900,000 people died from died due to COVID.
Sort of from the story, NPR says A new study estimates that the
number of people who have died of COVID-19 in the US is more
than 900,000, a number 57 57% higher than official figures.
worldwide. The study authors say that, say the COVID-19 death
count is nearing 7 million more than double the reported number
of 3.2 4 million. So how did they get this? They didn't just
look at people who died of COVID. They looked at everything
else under the sun, every side death that, you know could be
attributed to something attached to COVID. So hear more from the
NPR story.
Then it examined other mortality factors influenced by the
pandemic, for example, some of the extra deaths that were
caused by increased opioid opioid overdoses or deferred
healthcare. Those were counted as COVID deaths. So opioid
overdoses, maybe because paramedics couldn't get to them
quick enough. Maybe they got to the hospital and whatever care
they received, they couldn't couldn't be fast enough. So
deferred health care, and overdoses are counted in this
report, as an estimated COVID. And it says here, let's see
researchers at the at UW and I can't remember what the what the
research where it was. Maybe University of Wisconsin, I don't
remember ultimately concluded that the extra deaths not
directly caused by COVID were effectively offset by other
reductions in death rates. When you put all that together, we
conclude that the best way, the closest estimate for true COVID
death is still excess mortality, because some of those things are
on the positive side. Other factors are on the negative
side. So they're just they're just taking stabs at it now.
They're not counting things that are actually COVID deaths.
They're just counting everything. So you know, if you
if you take if you take it as as they report it, lockdown caused
nearly as many deaths as directly related to COVID as the
numbers count, and that should be that should be troublesome
and kind of disturbing. More on COVID. And whether or not this
was a lab created virus, Sky News. I think this is Sky News
from Australia.
Unknown: First tonight, new details from a document produced
by Chinese military scientists where they discuss weaponizing
SARS coronaviruses, five years before the pandemic hit the Go
figure written by People's Liberation Army scientists and
senior Chinese public health officials back in 2015. It
describes SAS coronaviruses, as heralding, and I quote, a new
era of genetic weapons. It says They can be artificially
manipulated into an emerging human disease virus weaponized
and unleashed in a way never seen before.
Kevin Bae: So kind of sounds like the other stories that that
I covered earlier where the lab may be perhaps funded by NIH was
fiddling around with some coronaviruses and trying to make
them trying to see if they could make them more infectious
towards humans, and maybe unleashing that upon the world.
Who knows. It's another conspiracy theory, but I really
can't wait for all this COVID stuff to go away. It's just been
all consuming, all consuming. And, you know, like I went to
the store today, I went to a public supermarket, and at least
here in the north eastern suburbs of Georgia. mask wearing
isn't so prevalent anymore. There are people walking around
like normal people. It will be nice once we get back to just
just being the usual jerks. We always are but I just need to
move on to something else. I'm just so sick and tired of this
stuff. We'll see what happens next week.
That's all I got.
See what I can do that's uplifting on the blog. I'm
always known for my positivity. Sarcasm, by the way. Anyway,
enjoy the rest of your weekend.
Please let me know if you listen to this podcast. I have no idea
if anybody's listening. I'm still posting everything so I
don't have any data. I'm sure I do. But I just don't know how to
get in it right now. I haven't bothered to figure it out. Send
me a line. Mail at Kevin b.com m Ei L. or on Twitter my handle is
at Kevin baby. My name is spelled ke vi n b isn't boy he
later on